"The Proposal" Movie Review

August 29th, 2010

“The Proposal” (my 0-10 rating: 6)

Director: Anne Fletcher

Screenplay: Pete Chiarelli.

Cast: Sandra Bullock, Ryan Reynolds, Mary Steenburgen, Craig T. Nelson, Betty White

Time: 1 hr., 47 min.

Rating: PG-13 (sexual content, nudity and vulgarity)

Yes, it’s old, old material but as always, it ain’t the joke, it’s the way it’s delivered. “The Proposal” is solid entertainment, well-romanced by reasonable but not sizzling chemistry between Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds. I can’t, however, really give it a “good” rating because it’s fairly devoid of any romance-comedy imagination and a bit loaded with shaky contrivances.

A lot of reliable charm pervades this movie, with intimacies — like nude scenes — delivered cautiously to avoid the R rating. Director Anne Fletcher seems to hold a cannily calculated grip on the intrinsic appeal of each scene, that built-in essence that attracts you at subliminal levels regardless of quality of substance or total predictability of plot direction. Going to this film is like going home, taking yourself back into the warmth of your heart where you are reassured that love can work even if details are missing.

Unquestionably, there’s a significant problem is having Sandra Bullock in there as a witchy type. She’s just not that. But early on, you get it: this is not a film to be picked apart. It’s just good old honest fun. Fact is, she and Reynolds leave little more to be desired in every interaction, clicking flawlessly, if not inspirationally.

Andrew (Ryan Reynolds), the brow-beaten assistant of aggressive New York book editor Margaret (Sandra Bullock) for the past three years, at last may see the tables turned. Seems she’s Canadian and she’s caught in a sudden unexpected bind. Advised that she’s about to be deported, she has to think fast, coming up with the blatant fiction that Andrew is her fiance and that they’ll forthwith be wed.

Well, . . . OK, he responds, he’ll put on the act but only under certain conditions. She’s to be required to come visit his family in Sitka, Alaska for a weekend. The idea here is that they can use this up close and personal time to get to know a little more of each other’s eccentricities, like, for instance, tattoos, allergies (to pine nuts and a wide variety of emotions) plus lots more.

But the dominating change in their individual lives is that Margaret is now plainly on Andrews’ turf. First of all, his family appears to own most of the town (interiors and almost all locations were shot in Massachusetts). And his family is a mite quirky. Mom, Grace (Mary Steenburgen), is welcoming, but imposing dad, Joe (Craig T. Nelson), who has an abiding bitterness over his son’s rejection of the family business, resents this distraction who Andrew has brought home. Grandma Annie is about to celebrate her 90th birthday and there will be a hastily contrived wedding and, not surprisingly, an immigration official on their trail.

Ryan Reynolds more than fills the screen in most of his scenes, his poker-faced demeanor a decided plus. Sandra Bullock delivers a very professional role, up to every nuance. Bit by bit she exposes the pain in her stridency, the career-contrived surface which she has always projected, in which we can realize her emotional wounds that make her assaults on Andrew, as she sees them, necessary. Andrew and Margaret become totally real.

A pleasant experience, if that works for you.

Marty Meltz was, for 30 years, films critic for the statewide Award-winning Maine Sunday Telegram till his column was terminated in budget-cuts on 12-31-07. His website is at http://www.martymoviereviews.com

Thanks To : Discount Usa 5 Buy Etv1927Plt Price for Printable Take Advantage Of http://lucyblank.hotcliques.com/ http://ppanella.blogspot.com/

Bookmark and Share

Matt Damon in the Bourne Ultimatum – Movie Review

August 23rd, 2010

BOTTOM LINE: Kick-arse thriller that delivers all the stops; a deeply satisfying conclusion to an outstanding trilogy.

THE GOOD: This is the perfect conclusion to the Bourne series. The film is just as gripping as the previous two, throwing you right in to the thick of the action from the beginning and never letting up pace. The intrigue surrounding Jason Bourne’s past finally comes full circle in this film and there isn’t a second that goes past where you are left hanging on the edge of your seat waiting for the outcome. Matt Damon is excellent as Bourne, showing a maturity and a brutalness required for such a demanding role. You just love it that he’s smarter than the guys (and girls) chasing him. The supporting players are also excellent, in particular David Straitham as the CIA director out to get Bourne who has a hidden agenda, and Joan Allen as the only person within the agency who comes to believe that Bourne may be innocent of the crimes he has been accused of. The tension in the film is incredible, and also includes some incredible fight scenes which go above and beyond what you’d expect. Director Greengrass has shaped a tough, intelligent spy film with quick cutting and a sense of immediacy in the camera work (a nice contrast to say Bond films which are also good but in different ways). The film just sped along and by the end, you almost feel that it shouldn’t have to end with this film!

THE BAD: Not a whole lot. One could get nit-picky with the shaky camera-work because it can make you feel sick when you see it on the big screen for any longer then ten minutes but hey, it also adds to the tension. Just a minor point. And if it’s your thing, then the film is perfect!

For the original review, follow this link: http://www.allaboutmovies.net/filmreviewthebourneultimatum.htm

Todd Murphy is a staff reviewer at the film/DVD review web site, All About Movies.net – for all the latest reviews on the newest releases. He also contributes reviews and articles for the Digicosm Film Blog: http://www.filmannex.com/Digicosm

Friends Link : Cheap Price Timewolf 40 Time http://imadieingbreed.com/dougjacox/

Bookmark and Share

"Duplicity" Movie Review

August 22nd, 2010

“Duplicity” (quality rating: 8 out of 10)

Director: Tony Gilroy

Screenplay: Tony Gilroy

Cast: Julia Roberts, Clive Owen, Tom Wilkinson, Paul Giamatti

Time: 2 hrs., 5 min.

Rating: PG-13 (vulgarity, some sexual content)

Smart. Very smart. Indeed, it is so sophisticated, loaded with mazes of mazes of plot turns and dazzling wit that, y’ know, you may not even like it.

I’ll observe that if you truly comprehend and follow every scene, you’re at major league level rocket scientist level. It is best, you realize after a bit, if you just let it all flow as long as you understand what the key characters’ basic motivations are. “Who was that?” and “What’s s/he mean by that?” are just too complex to deal with continuously.

To make matters even more challenging, time periods are mixed freely, although captions do advise you as to when you are where you are.

Roberts and Owen are absolutely electric together, drawing, repelling equal and opposite energies, radiating a crackling romance undertone. Their dialogue is so peppery and provocative that you’re just handling one retort when two more overwhelm you. At the same time, the sizzling dynamic of corporate greed chillingly overruns the schemes.

For sure, forget your popcorn as your intellect will be demanded at max. Be ready to nudge your companion time and again with, “Are you getting this?” (Some indication of the twists, turns and density of plot may be indicated by the film having been written and directed by Tony Gilroy who did last year’s “Michael Clayton”).

For an opening, after two high-powered CEOs physically duke it out on the tarmac between their corporate jets, try a sexy bed-goaled confrontation in Dubai between Claire Stenwick (Julia Roberts), formerly of the CIA, and Ray Koval (Clive Owen), formerly of Britain’s MI6.

Five years later, 2008, Ray runs across Claire again in Grand Central Station. She claims she doesn’t remember him. That bit of gamesmanship, among countless others between them, is going to keep popping up time and again.

The question asked is — where does love fit in on the list of priorities when this pair, each working for two competing multi-conglomerate corporations know that nothing, but nothing, must stop the acquisition of a secret formula that will bring untold riches to the winner? Seems that Claire and Ray have taken on the assignment from mighty moguls Howard Tully (Tom Wilkinson) and a pirating CEO Dick Garsik (Paul Giamatti) who will accept no option of failure in the whole world in getting that formula. But, not surprisingly, Claire and Ray really have as their first motive the pilfering of the formula for themselves. Speaking in nothing but fluent duplicity and intrigue, every phrase of every word, phrase and sentence is a killer move on a chess board, especially with each and every individual on hair-trigger response mode.

Pursuing high stakes of outer orbit levels, with their diabolical CEO overseers operating at ruthless high-tech max with razor-sharp operatives, each is perfectly confident of success until . . . love. So how is their world of cross, double-cross and triple-cross will they make it? True, they’re each profoundly dedicated loners. But love won’t accept that background. And neither party to it will trust the other. They both know they’re made for each other, but both know they can’t reveal that or a lot of other things.

Let the games begin, even as the corporate chiefs ride a whip hand with no mercy.

Here’s your intelligent person’s romance intrigue at stratospheric levels. Good luck.

Marty Meltz, 30-year former films critic for the Portland (Maine) Sunday Telegram. Offering right-to-the-point reviews that address directly the question of the film’s entertainment value to you. Films have personalities. It doesn’t matter who wrote it, who directs it, who stars in it, if it doesn’t reach out to you with charisma. I examine its honesty and intelligence. Are you being respected, or are you being jerked around?

Visit : Rehablade 120 http://slrcamerawithflash.3uu.info/ http://garduweb.com/randymorel/

Bookmark and Share